pwdd
-
NiagaraMike
Re: pwdd
PWDD is pretty much complete except for machinery and tools etc.
I live just a few blocks away and the buildings, graving docks etc are still untouched or unmodified.
In fact building repairs have been done recently and the whole complex appears well looked after.
I don't see why building could not restart at some point if the economics and the will to do so was there.
Theres a fabrication company in Welland that recently built railcars on mass under contract with a company from Roanoke out of the blue. While railcars are not ships the logistics are not that diferent.
I live just a few blocks away and the buildings, graving docks etc are still untouched or unmodified.
In fact building repairs have been done recently and the whole complex appears well looked after.
I don't see why building could not restart at some point if the economics and the will to do so was there.
Theres a fabrication company in Welland that recently built railcars on mass under contract with a company from Roanoke out of the blue. While railcars are not ships the logistics are not that diferent.
-
Denny
Re: pwdd
What about the tug Presque Isle? I know at times when she needs a five year drydocking or something like that, she would then head to the pwdd. Is the pwdd still capable then of accommodating her, or does she have to go to another shipyard for whatever it is that she has done at pwdd? Could Erie or Sturgeon Bay due the same type of work on the tug PI that pwdd does? Just curious is all here. Any information is appreciated. Thanks so very much in advance.
-
Guest
Re: pwdd
The drydock at Port Weller was built in 1931 by the Canadian government. Port Weller Drydocks was set up in 1946 and the drydock was leased from the government. Upper Lakes Shipping took over operations in the 50s.
Being the only drydock on the Canadian side of the Great Lakes with a capability of docking a loaded vessel, it has a versatility that can't be matched.
As for shipbuilding, well that seems very remote. It would be nice, but you need skilled workers (easy to find) and skilled management (very hard to find; either left for other businesses, retired or passed away.)
Being the only drydock on the Canadian side of the Great Lakes with a capability of docking a loaded vessel, it has a versatility that can't be matched.
As for shipbuilding, well that seems very remote. It would be nice, but you need skilled workers (easy to find) and skilled management (very hard to find; either left for other businesses, retired or passed away.)
-
PDBLK25
Re: pwdd
First off, pardon my ignorence but I have never been to Port Weller. With so many ship-building and ship-repair facilities being destroyed for ship usage (the Collingwood Shipyard, AmShip's 130th Street Chicago Yard, the former main AmShip Yard in Lorain). Why doesn't CSL, Algoma or both of them in combination buy PWDD to ensure that it stays a Dry-Dock and doesn't become another former Ship-Repair / Building site covered with dirt and used as Condominium space? Or is that not possible at Port Weller?
Re: pwdd
MikeCDN wrote:What's left at that facility? Are they still capable of draining the drydocks?
What would it take, besides money, to get this fully operational again?
They are more than capable of draining the drydocks else this wouldn't be happening. Algoma Enterprise spent all of last winter in there...
-
NiagaraMike
Re: pwdd
Its guaranteed that Algoma will continue to use PWDD thru their sister company Algoma Ship Repair( originally Fraser Marine ).
The refit and 5 year survey of Algoma Enterprise went well last winter, so no reason to think it won't continue.
I think that is especially true because of the Chinese shipyard fiasco they got themselves into. It was interesting that the recent Bear Facts news letter only refers to the two recently contracted to Croatia.
No mention of CWB Strongfield or Algoma Niagara which were considerably far along in construction.
The refit and 5 year survey of Algoma Enterprise went well last winter, so no reason to think it won't continue.
I think that is especially true because of the Chinese shipyard fiasco they got themselves into. It was interesting that the recent Bear Facts news letter only refers to the two recently contracted to Croatia.
No mention of CWB Strongfield or Algoma Niagara which were considerably far along in construction.