by Mr Link » April 21, 2014, 10:25 pm
An AIS tracking site that has a free vessel passage archive shows the following vessels passing through "NS 5" and their rough times on the afternoon of April 9th
John M Selvick 15:20
Spartan 16:08
MMSI 366925150 22:32 (vessel name not shown, probably a towboat)
John M. Selvick 22:55
But the site doesn't show if the archived times are local times or UTC times (local plus 5 hrs for CDT), so any of those four passages, or any others not recorded could have snagged your train. A good number of the towboats working the Calumet River don't have AIS, so their passages are not recorded via AIS. The only real record would be the bridge tenders log and the vessels log.
Finally, was 353 anywhere near on time? Amtrak's own performance tracking shows the Michigan Service running just 51.9% on time in March and only 31.6% on time over the past year. And that's after they include their "on time" fudge factor where arriving up to 30 minutes late is considered "on time".
An AIS tracking site that has a free vessel passage archive shows the following vessels passing through "NS 5" and their rough times on the afternoon of April 9th
John M Selvick 15:20
Spartan 16:08
MMSI 366925150 22:32 (vessel name not shown, probably a towboat)
John M. Selvick 22:55
But the site doesn't show if the archived times are local times or UTC times (local plus 5 hrs for CDT), so any of those four passages, or any others not recorded could have snagged your train. A good number of the towboats working the Calumet River don't have AIS, so their passages are not recorded via AIS. The only real record would be the bridge tenders log and the vessels log.
Finally, was 353 anywhere near on time? Amtrak's own performance tracking shows the Michigan Service running just 51.9% on time in March and only 31.6% on time over the past year. And that's after they include their "on time" fudge factor where arriving up to 30 minutes late is considered "on time".