by LeoA » May 9, 2011, 6:52 pm
I don't know what sailors on the Lakes think of it, but if we're thinking of past USS and Bradley ships to honor, I think it would be neat to see both Carl D. Bradley's honored with a 3rd ship carrying that name.
It's not at all unusual for Naval ships to honor a ship that has been lost, so I'm not sure if it's considered unlucky by superstitious sailors in the merchant marine. If it isn't viewed negatively by many of their employees, I think it would be nice to see it revived.
Either way, I hope they do what CSL does and honor a past member of their fleet, no matter which one it is.
I don't know what sailors on the Lakes think of it, but if we're thinking of past USS and Bradley ships to honor, I think it would be neat to see both Carl D. Bradley's honored with a 3rd ship carrying that name.
It's not at all unusual for Naval ships to honor a ship that has been lost, so I'm not sure if it's considered unlucky by superstitious sailors in the merchant marine. If it isn't viewed negatively by many of their employees, I think it would be nice to see it revived.
Either way, I hope they do what CSL does and honor a past member of their fleet, no matter which one it is.