by Guest » August 21, 2019, 5:45 pm
The unloading rates for Huletts at particular docks depended on the number of machines at the dock, the size of the bucket and their condition. And as another poster said, spillage and breakdowns - which became more common as the Huletts aged.
For example, the A&B Dock in Ashtabula had four, 17-ton Huletts with a combined hourly caoacity of 2,500 tons.
But at the C&P dock in Cleveland, their four, 17-ton Huletts had a combined hourly unloading capacity of 3,300 tons. An 800 ton difference from A&B and one of the reasons why the C&P dock's Huletts remained in operation far longer than most.
The unloading rates for Huletts at particular docks depended on the number of machines at the dock, the size of the bucket and their condition. And as another poster said, spillage and breakdowns - which became more common as the Huletts aged.
For example, the A&B Dock in Ashtabula had four, 17-ton Huletts with a combined hourly caoacity of 2,500 tons.
But at the C&P dock in Cleveland, their four, 17-ton Huletts had a combined hourly unloading capacity of 3,300 tons. An 800 ton difference from A&B and one of the reasons why the C&P dock's Huletts remained in operation far longer than most.