by Guest » February 22, 2020, 6:29 pm
The announcement made no mention of the merging of the ASC fleet with GRN/LLT. So I read that as meaning they will be operated as separate entities for now. Therefore the John J. Boland can be expected to still wear ASC colours.
I don't know if the proposed Santa Fe/Southern Pacific merger is the best analogy. I certainly remember it. The ICC was infamous for taking years before giving approval to railroad mergers - most times they were nixed. Witness the proposed merger of Union Pacific with Rock Island. The hearings took 10-years, and by the time it was approved, Union Pacific walked away from the merger because most of Rock Island's tracks, locomotives and railcars were in horrible condition. (By the late '70s you were lucky if the train stayed on the tracks for more than a few miles).
The announcement made no mention of the merging of the ASC fleet with GRN/LLT. So I read that as meaning they will be operated as separate entities for now. Therefore the John J. Boland can be expected to still wear ASC colours.
I don't know if the proposed Santa Fe/Southern Pacific merger is the best analogy. I certainly remember it. The ICC was infamous for taking years before giving approval to railroad mergers - most times they were nixed. Witness the proposed merger of Union Pacific with Rock Island. The hearings took 10-years, and by the time it was approved, Union Pacific walked away from the merger because most of Rock Island's tracks, locomotives and railcars were in horrible condition. (By the late '70s you were lucky if the train stayed on the tracks for more than a few miles).