by beecher » December 5, 2011, 11:55 am
The need for the canal to have flowing water is a low priority in my humble opinion. We go months at a time when the gates are closed and maintenance & capital projects are performed on the canal all summer long. Not one of the visitors to this National Park seems to mind. (BTW- this NP has one of the highest visitation rates in the nation.)
The canal passage went all the way to the Ohio River in its heyday. Much of it was destroyed by flooding and especially the last straw in the Great flood of 1913. Most of all the locks are preserved to this day. But in many cases the river water will never be re-introduced into the canal above the B'Ville Dam because it will not retain the water from all the flood damage of yesteryear.
The canal only has a historical purpose. Feeding the last section from the B'Dam creates a flow that is discharged into the Cuyahoga River about 13 miles down stream and about 2-3 miles above the Lower Federal Navigation Channel. Roads were built right across the canal by filling it in at that point. The Canal becomes a long lake North of this point and is stocked with game fish. Many folks fish there. It ends/disappears as it nears Alcoa & Harvard Avenue.
I feel the dam can go away. They can fill the canal with water like a bathtub and have a much, much less flow. I believe they can control the outflow to a trickle thus only needing little make-up water from the dam area. Tinkers Creek and other creeks can help as well. It is not rocket science.
The #1 trouble IMHO is the Feds and the EPA maintaining their budgets.
We also had lives lost at this dam. In flooding conditions it will not release anything including swamped canoeists and Fire & Rescue personnel multiple times. I have witnessed the recovery of such a fate. The dam will also not allow the fish back to where they use to thrive. Did you see that fish in Guest2's video! That is what I'm talkin' about!
The wild game in the Valley includes just about anything. We have large wild cats, stray bear, enough deer to feed Africa's hungry, beaver, water fowl, American Bald Eagles and any other raptor you can name. Why can't we restore one of their natural food sources and rip out the dam dam. As for using a new method for repairing/replacing the bulkheads of the Lower Cuyahoga, I am all for the cheaper method because the fish are doing just fine leaving the urban section and finding habitat above it.
Just sayin'.
The need for the canal to have flowing water is a low priority in my humble opinion. We go months at a time when the gates are closed and maintenance & capital projects are performed on the canal all summer long. Not one of the visitors to this National Park seems to mind. (BTW- this NP has one of the highest visitation rates in the nation.)
The canal passage went all the way to the Ohio River in its heyday. Much of it was destroyed by flooding and especially the last straw in the Great flood of 1913. Most of all the locks are preserved to this day. But in many cases the river water will never be re-introduced into the canal above the B'Ville Dam because it will not retain the water from all the flood damage of yesteryear.
The canal only has a historical purpose. Feeding the last section from the B'Dam creates a flow that is discharged into the Cuyahoga River about 13 miles down stream and about 2-3 miles above the Lower Federal Navigation Channel. Roads were built right across the canal by filling it in at that point. The Canal becomes a long lake North of this point and is stocked with game fish. Many folks fish there. It ends/disappears as it nears Alcoa & Harvard Avenue.
I feel the dam can go away. They can fill the canal with water like a bathtub and have a much, much less flow. I believe they can control the outflow to a trickle thus only needing little make-up water from the dam area. Tinkers Creek and other creeks can help as well. It is not rocket science.
The #1 trouble IMHO is the Feds and the EPA maintaining their budgets.
We also had lives lost at this dam. In flooding conditions it will not release anything including swamped canoeists and Fire & Rescue personnel multiple times. I have witnessed the recovery of such a fate. The dam will also not allow the fish back to where they use to thrive. Did you see that fish in Guest2's video! That is what I'm talkin' about!
The wild game in the Valley includes just about anything. We have large wild cats, stray bear, enough deer to feed Africa's hungry, beaver, water fowl, American Bald Eagles and any other raptor you can name. Why can't we restore one of their natural food sources and rip out the dam dam. As for using a new method for repairing/replacing the bulkheads of the Lower Cuyahoga, I am all for the cheaper method because the fish are doing just fine leaving the urban section and finding habitat above it.
Just sayin'.