Cutter Acushnet

Post a reply


BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 3 MiB.

Expand view Topic review: Cutter Acushnet

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Guest » June 9, 2013, 3:16 am

Timerover51 wrote:Greetings all, I have been spending the past couple of days helping my son load his shipping container for his move to California to start his new job, so I have been otherwise occupied. I will start getting back on here on Monday.
Here's a new boat for you Timeover51, just have to find it and get aboard! Probably has both anchors!
http://gcaptain.com/russian-ghost-ship-vanished/

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Timerover51 » June 8, 2013, 7:33 pm

Greetings all, I have been spending the past couple of days helping my son load his shipping container for his move to California to start his new job, so I have been otherwise occupied. I will start getting back on here on Monday.

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Chief » June 8, 2013, 3:36 pm

She had her anchors after she got to her present mooring. Scroll back down and it explains what happened. The ship was taken out in a gale and they became fouled so the story goes and they had to cut the chains as they couldn't raise them. That's one story. Bottom line is that they will have to be replaced before the Coast Guard will let her sail along with the entire electronics package, life saving gear, firefighting eqp, and I am sure other things.

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Guest » June 8, 2013, 1:41 pm

Guest wrote:Decommissioning
Looks like she had her anchors at her decommisssing, so it wasn't the CG that cut them off.

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by DavidFrank » June 7, 2013, 1:54 pm

Your miles could be more correct than mine. I used the distance calculator at sea-distances.com. That shows 4,005 miles from Anacortes, Wa to Balboa, Panama. I have no idea if that accounts for making a safe water passage. Total distance from Anacortes (where the vessel is located) to Milwaukee was listed at 8,255 miles.

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Guest » June 7, 2013, 7:59 am

Seattle to the Panama Canal is 4500 miles. The trip from the Atlantic end of he seaway to beer town is 2500 miles

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Guest » June 7, 2013, 7:20 am

Decommissioning
Attachments
Acushnet-Decommissioning 3-11.jpg

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Timerover51 » June 6, 2013, 5:24 pm

Guest wrote:Where did the anchors go?
That is a very good question, to which no one seems to know the answer too. The individual that bought it claims that the Coast Guard cut them off, which is more than a bit ludicrous. At last report, the primary stock holder in the company that purchased the ship is, or was, in jail in Utah, and his present whereabouts are unknown. The legal situation is more than a bit messy, and it keeps getting messier. There is an outstanding towing bill for the tow from Ketchikan to Anacortes, Washington of $80K as well as the dockage fees. There may be others out there with claims on the ship as well. Approximately 15 tons of spare parts that were included in the sale have disappeared as well, part of which were very salable copper wire.

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Guest » June 6, 2013, 12:17 am

Where did the anchors go?

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by burger » June 5, 2013, 9:17 pm

what about the cost for pilots through Quebec and the St. Lawrence Sea Way

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Guest » June 5, 2013, 4:47 am

Seattle to Puerto Vallarta Mexico is 2600 miles.

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by MN Boater » June 5, 2013, 4:16 am

Timerover51 wrote:
William Lafferty wrote:
Why not bring the boat up the Mississippi through Chicago? That would cut your travel time, and fuel bill in half
Because none of the bridges over the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal is today operable for opening. The maximum air draft is 17 feet. Maximum air draft using the combined Sanitary and Ship Canal and the Cal-Sag is 19.1 feet. These figures are dependent, of course, upon current water levels.
The problem is not just air draft. The guaranteed depth of the Cal-Sag Canal is 9 feet. She will draw considerably more than that. So it is up and around. If nothing else, the scenery should be terrific at times.
The Mississippi s only dredged to 9 foot. The specs on the Acushnet says it draufts 14 foot. When your draft exceeds your depth, you are aground!!

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Timerover51 » June 5, 2013, 3:42 am

Guest 7 wrote:You could spend $500K in fuel to bring the Acushnet to Lake Michigan. Or buy a nice home in Anacortes and use it there.
I do not think that it will take 120,000 to 125,000 gallons of fuel to get her to Lake Michigan. As for using it, I have uses for it here, and also in the Solomon Islands in the South Pacific, and possibly on the North Coast of Alaska. I do not have uses for it in Washington State waters. Having spent time at Fort Lewis outside of Seattle, I have no desire to live in an area where it rains at least 365 days a year, although I would probably exclude the southeast Alaskan Panhandle from that.

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Revalator » June 4, 2013, 4:36 pm

Can't find your email, mine is revalator@gmail.com

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Wheelsman » June 4, 2013, 4:26 pm

Add me to your list please. I have a valid unlimited A.B
weszes@yahoo.com

Bill E.

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Timerover51 » June 4, 2013, 2:18 pm

William Lafferty wrote:
Why not bring the boat up the Mississippi through Chicago? That would cut your travel time, and fuel bill in half
Because none of the bridges over the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal is today operable for opening. The maximum air draft is 17 feet. Maximum air draft using the combined Sanitary and Ship Canal and the Cal-Sag is 19.1 feet. These figures are dependent, of course, upon current water levels.
The problem is not just air draft. The guaranteed depth of the Cal-Sag Canal is 9 feet. She will draw considerably more than that. So it is up and around. If nothing else, the scenery should be terrific at times.

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Timerover51 » June 4, 2013, 2:16 pm

Guest wrote:
Timerover51 wrote:I got off the phone a little while ago with the shipyard in Anacortes, Washington where the former Coast Guard cutter Acushnet is presently docked. The purchasers have abandoned the ship and the dockyard is in the process of seizing if for unpaid dock fees. Some of you might remember that I was looking at getting the Bramble for use on the lakes and South Pacific. I have still been looking for a ship. If I can get her, she will be homeported on Lake Michigan, probably Milwaukee. I do need to get her here. This is a bit of very short notice.

Anyone out there interested in a trip from Seattle to Milwaukee, courtesy of the Panama Canal and Seaway as part of a crew? She is Diesel-electric, with the same engines, based on a conversation with Brent Michaels, as the Mackinaw.
What dos it cost to dock a ship that size, in docking fees? Why would giving the boat up for unpaid fees be a good deal when they paid 209K for the boat? What do you think it cost the MUnson I believe to sit at the Murphy fuel dock all winter?
They paid $600K plus for the ship. Dockage fees right now are about $40K. She also needs two 5,000 pounds anchors and some chain, with that running about a Dollar a pound. Also needs navigation set up.

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by Timerover51 » June 4, 2013, 2:13 pm

davidfrank wrote:The Acushnet has a draft of around 14 feet which may be a trifle deep for the Mississippi. Seattle to Chicago via the Panama Canal is 8300 miles which would take 35 days at an "economical" speed of 10 knots. Add in a few days for preparations and Panama Canal delays resulting in a 40 day trip. Holding over 95,000 gallons of fuel the Acushnet could make the trip without refueling. Use only two of the four main engines and cruise along at 10 knots you might get fuel consumption down to 2,000 gallons per day of high sulfur IFO180, meaning $5000-$6000 in fuel use per day. The result is a 40 day trip using $250K of fuel (if everything goes perfectly).
Brent Michaels worked up a 40 day estimate, with fuel consumption about or under a 1,000 gallons a day. The power plant is very similar to the Mackinaw and the 180s. A 180 at cruising speed was about 600 to a 1,000 gallons per day. She presently has about 25,000 to 30,000 gallons of fuel onboard.

Those of you who have posted email addresses, I will get to you in the next day or two.

As to when the trip would go down, that all depends on how well a real legal mess regarding ownership can be resolved, and what the eventual owner wants for her. I do have to budget for some additional fuel. Panama Canal fees, crew expenses, stores for about 15 to 20 men for 40 days, along with whatever the Coast Guard might require above that. I will not know that until getting the ship.

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by davidfrank » June 4, 2013, 10:46 am

The Acushnet has a draft of around 14 feet which may be a trifle deep for the Mississippi. Seattle to Chicago via the Panama Canal is 8300 miles which would take 35 days at an "economical" speed of 10 knots. Add in a few days for preparations and Panama Canal delays resulting in a 40 day trip. Holding over 95,000 gallons of fuel the Acushnet could make the trip without refueling. Use only two of the four main engines and cruise along at 10 knots you might get fuel consumption down to 2,000 gallons per day of high sulfur IFO180, meaning $5000-$6000 in fuel use per day. The result is a 40 day trip using $250K of fuel (if everything goes perfectly).

Re: Cutter Acushnet

by William Lafferty » June 4, 2013, 10:02 am

Why not bring the boat up the Mississippi through Chicago? That would cut your travel time, and fuel bill in half
Because none of the bridges over the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal is today operable for opening. The maximum air draft is 17 feet. Maximum air draft using the combined Sanitary and Ship Canal and the Cal-Sag is 19.1 feet. These figures are dependent, of course, upon current water levels.

Top