Sturgeon Bay Activity

Post a reply


BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 3 MiB.

Expand view Topic review: Sturgeon Bay Activity

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by LisaIL » January 23, 2011, 11:19 pm

So of course, now I have more questions! I am reading the vessel passage tab. The locations listed which you click on, are they places that a ship checks into by radio or what exactly are those locations? And are they companies that report this information to your site? How does all these links work and what kind of information are they giving me? Some have lots of links to them, some have maps or looks like locations of which it appears there are ships appearing on them, while others not so much. Can you explain to me how to use this information?

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by LisaIL » January 23, 2011, 7:05 pm

Thank you ever so much for clarifying things for me, breaking down all of questions and helping me to understand what happens during the lay up season. I have a much better understanding now.

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by hausen » January 22, 2011, 1:53 pm

LisaIL wrote:I was reading the Layup schedule and see that the AMA is not listed for Layup in either the location or the date. Are those dates because of actual work being done to the ships or is that because the ship is still actively transporting loads, so it is a short visit and not an actual layup?
I don't think the good folks responsible for keeping the layup list up to date make any entries until the vessel has actually laid up for the winter. Think of the layup list as more of a log of what has happened than a forecast or schedule. The shipping industry can be pretty dynamic and unpredictable; it can be difficult to make predictions when things so often change at the last moment due to factors like weather and ice conditions or traffic congestion at a particular port or a change in the business needs of a shipping company's clients. Even scheduled winter layup ports can change at the last minute, as was the case with the American Mariner; she was supposed to layup at Duluth but weather delayed her last cargo carrying trip of the season and she wouldn't have been able to make it back up through the Soo Locks before they closed. Instead her company found a spot for her to winter in Toledo. The Anderson did lay up for the winter at Sturgeon Bay on 18 Jan, and now the data for her is on the Boatnerd layup list.

Or perhaps, maybe someone can explain to me what actually happens when a ship goes into layup. I'm thinking a layup is when a ship is taken out of action for repairs and maintenance and won't be back out until a particular date. Am I correct?
You are. Given the seasonal nature of most Great Lakes shipping activity (although there are a few different trades that often continue through most or all of the winter), almost every laker goes into 2-4 month layup from December or January through March or April. The most efficient and productive vessels usually have shorter winter layups unless something major is being done (like the new engines being installed on the Edwin H. Gott and Michipicoten this winter). If demand for cargo is weak, some of the less efficient/productive ships might have longer 'winter' layups.

And what is the clarification between long term and permanent? I'm thinking since 1979, sounds a little more permanent than long term.
This can be kind of a grey area. "Permanent" is probably used for a situation where it's clear the owner has retired the vessel but hasn't yet made a deal to dispose of it. "Long-term" is better suited to a situation where a ship's owner has no use for a vessel at present but doesn't seem to have any intention of getting rid of it - for example, the Interlake Steamship Co. has been holding onto the John Sherwin since it last operated in 1981; it's a nice large vessel that only sailed for 23 years before laying up so it's in decent condition, and someday it might prove useful to them again. Again this terminology difference might be fraught with grey areas and apparent inconsistencies that would only sort themselves out if we examined the unique and particular circumstances surrounding each vessel that's been in layup for a number of years.
Also if there is no information listed, are they out sailing or is it because this site just doesn't know what the ship is doing?


It could be either - the end of the shipping season can be a hectic time and it sometimes takes a few days for things to sort out and for a vessel's actual layup port to be confirmed. There are definitely a few ships still sailing though. Algomarine and possibly a few ULS ships (Canadian Progress and/or some of her other fleetmates) are carrying road salt cargoes from Goderich, ON to ports around the middle Great Lakes (theoretically ships can go anywhere below the Soo Locks and above the Welland Canal all winter long). Joseph L. Block, Wilfred Sykes, and possibly Joyce L. Van Enkevort/Great Lakes Trader are running taconite pellets from Escanaba, MI to steel mills on southern Lake Michigan. Many tankers (especially in the Algoma fleet) operate on and off all winter on the lakes as demand warrants and weather/ice conditions allow.

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by LisaIL » January 20, 2011, 3:53 pm

I was reading the Layup schedule and see that the AMA is not listed for Layup in either the location or the date. Are those dates because of actual work being done to the ships or is that because the ship is still actively transporting loads, so it is a short visit and not an actual layup? Or perhaps, maybe someone can explain to me what actually happens when a ship goes into layup. I'm thinking a layup is when a ship is taken out of action for repairs and maintenance and won't be back out until a particular date. Am I correct? And what is the clarification between long term and permanent? I'm thinking since 1979, sounds a little more permanent than long term. Also if there is no information listed, are they out sailing or is it because this site just doesn't know what the ship is doing?

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by LisaIL » January 19, 2011, 1:52 pm

Thank you for your information. I can not commend this site enough for it's valuable information through the eyes and experience of it's enthusiastic followers. Lisa

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by Guest » January 19, 2011, 12:52 pm

LisaIL wrote:What is Bayship. I find a Bayship canal, and a lighthouse. Is Bayship a company for layups? Is there viewing spots one can go there? I am assuming this is all near Sturegeon Bay and not familiar with the area. Also is the AMA there for the winter now or is there still traffic on Lake Michigan or any of the other Lakes? Thanks for helping me answer my questions. Lisa
Bayship is short for Bay Shipbuilding, the shipyard in Sturgeon Bay. It is one of the big spots for winter layup on the lakes, both because they have adequate berthing facilities and because a lot of vessels get winter work done while laid up, including some dry docking. There are spots to get some good views- you can drive/walk along the fences, and there are some decent spots across the canal to get some wider views. I'm not familiar enough with the town to give specific addresses, etc. Basically, once you're in Sturgeon Bay, look for the big gantry crane and head in that direction (the shipyard is on the north side of the canal, so you need to cross the bridge). You'll get there eventually.

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by LisaIL » January 19, 2011, 11:26 am

What is Bayship. I find a Bayship canal, and a lighthouse. Is Bayship a company for layups? Is there viewing spots one can go there? I am assuming this is all near Sturegeon Bay and not familiar with the area. Also is the AMA there for the winter now or is there still traffic on Lake Michigan or any of the other Lakes? Thanks for helping me answer my questions. Lisa

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by Guest » January 19, 2011, 9:43 am

As mentioned,the Anderson was on it's way to Bayship and is probably up there by now, Wednesday morning. I believe it is incorrectly identified in today's news photo gallery picture with the Jackson. The other ship is the Philip R. Clarke which was arriving yesterday right behind the Jackson. You can read the name if you look close enough. Once the Anderson gets there it will probably rafted alongside the Clarke. It's hard to say right now if it will be in a good vantage point for photos. Sometimes they park behind the building which blocks the view.

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by LisaIL » January 19, 2011, 12:40 am

I was excited when I saw someone talking about the Anderson near Racine. Racine, as in Racine WI? I thought the locks are closed now, so I wasn't looking at this site, as I thought all the ships were docked for the winter. So I guess I am asking, are they still traveling the Great Lakes, even now? Where is the Anderson going and Wherever she is going can I go photograph her? I am so excited, as she was very elusive this summer and I really want my own photo of her!

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by Bob+ » January 18, 2011, 10:24 pm

The Am. Courage is tied up on berth 3 not the Am. Voyager. Sorry about that.

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by Bob+ » January 18, 2011, 10:21 pm

The lakers at Bay Ship as of 18 January are the following, Gott, Indaiana Harbor and W. McCarthy on on berth 15; Saginaw on berth 9; Mesabi Miner and Paul Tregurtha berthed out on the face; American Voyager berth 3 and John J. Boland on berth 2. There is a tug in the small graving dock and the Pineglen is in the large graving dock. The Herbert Jackson and the Phillip Clarke are both off of Pot park in the Hills Pt area and probably waiting for the morning to be tied up, both lakers are coming in stern first. Not sure if they dropped anchor or just sitting in the nice.

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by Guest » January 18, 2011, 5:56 pm

Arthur M Anderson northbound off Racine enroute and should be at Bayship early tomorrow. Going from the layup list on the other page, this just leaves the Sykes and Block to arrive, assuming the Maumee is not coming. I don't think Bayship can handle 17 boats. Looks more like 14 will be there plus the Barbara Andrie. The AMA will be the 12th.

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by Timerover51 » January 18, 2011, 3:26 pm

Bob+ wrote:Yes, the Saginaw is for lay-up and is tied up on berth 7, stern first. The McCarthy was berthed along the wall on berth 15. The Gott and Indaina Harbor were pulled from the wall by Selvick Tugs and thee McCarthy was slid in. Also the Tregurtha is still between the bridges and at this time the Herbert C. Jackson is backing down from Sherwood Pt. and is off Hills Pt at noon.
Bob, how many ships are there already? According to Bob Dash, head of the Door County Maritime Museum, there will be 17 lake boats laid up this winter in Sturgeon Bay.

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by Bob+ » January 18, 2011, 1:07 pm

Yes, the Saginaw is for lay-up and is tied up on berth 7, stern first. The McCarthy was berthed along the wall on berth 15. The Gott and Indaina Harbor were pulled from the wall by Selvick Tugs and thee McCarthy was slid in. Also the Tregurtha is still between the bridges and at this time the Herbert C. Jackson is backing down from Sherwood Pt. and is off Hills Pt at noon.

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by Guest » January 18, 2011, 11:09 am

Yes, according to the information on the information search board under the subject Sturgeon Bay Lay-up. Right now the Jackson should be arriving off the bay, the Clarke is coming down the bay. Anyone know what the sixth boat is?

Re: Sturgeon Bay Activity

by Guest » January 18, 2011, 10:29 am

Is the Saginaw there to Lay up?

Sturgeon Bay Activity

by Bob+ » January 18, 2011, 8:44 am

The Saginaw came in to Bay Ship early this morning. The McCarthy and Paul Tregurtha are between the bridges with the McCarthy leading the way. There is suppose to be six boats total coming in today.

Top