by Guest » December 1, 2024, 11:22 am
She grounded in the 70's with some minor ballast tank damage. Not aware of any other incidents of note, although she's probably had several brief encounters with getting stuck like any Great Lakes freighter has with the dredging deficit that never seems to go away.
That said, except at her stern her bottom all dates to 1996. And her engine is about 10 years even newer than that. She's not really a ship from 1967 at this point. The critical wearing parts of her have been renewed. That's why she, along with the John D. Leitch, are still active members of the fleet and have outlasted the newer 1970's and 1980's additions to the Algoma and Upper Lakes Shipping fleets (along with the Algobay's refurbished stern that lives on as the Radcliffe R. Latimer).
Her future will be decided by a survey of her bottom when she's successfully refloated. With an approximate 30 year lifespan on her mid 1990's rebuilding and with overseas construction economically feasible with the lifting of import tariffs, she's in her twilight years with no chance of a 2nd major renewal project. But I believe that she just had her 5 year survey and a lot of steelwork done a winter or two ago, so I wouldn't count her out yet.
Of course if hundreds of feet of bottom plating require replacement from being stuck on rocks, it's probably not going to end well for her. But she seems to just be stuck in the mud with no signs of damage or water intrusion, with the bottom suction proving difficult for the tugs to overcome. I believe that the next step being planned right now is lightering a portion of her wheat cargo. With any luck she'll be able to wrap the season up with a couple of more trips if the divers don't see any problems.
She grounded in the 70's with some minor ballast tank damage. Not aware of any other incidents of note, although she's probably had several brief encounters with getting stuck like any Great Lakes freighter has with the dredging deficit that never seems to go away.
That said, except at her stern her bottom all dates to 1996. And her engine is about 10 years even newer than that. She's not really a ship from 1967 at this point. The critical wearing parts of her have been renewed. That's why she, along with the John D. Leitch, are still active members of the fleet and have outlasted the newer 1970's and 1980's additions to the Algoma and Upper Lakes Shipping fleets (along with the Algobay's refurbished stern that lives on as the Radcliffe R. Latimer).
Her future will be decided by a survey of her bottom when she's successfully refloated. With an approximate 30 year lifespan on her mid 1990's rebuilding and with overseas construction economically feasible with the lifting of import tariffs, she's in her twilight years with no chance of a 2nd major renewal project. But I believe that she just had her 5 year survey and a lot of steelwork done a winter or two ago, so I wouldn't count her out yet.
Of course if hundreds of feet of bottom plating require replacement from being stuck on rocks, it's probably not going to end well for her. But she seems to just be stuck in the mud with no signs of damage or water intrusion, with the bottom suction proving difficult for the tugs to overcome. I believe that the next step being planned right now is lightering a portion of her wheat cargo. With any luck she'll be able to wrap the season up with a couple of more trips if the divers don't see any problems.