by middlerouge » March 7, 2014, 12:14 am
I previously posted about using explosives to break ice, and i now have a new question:
If the alder was not Purpose built for icebreaking, then why is it being used to break ice that some reports are saying is 5' thick? Would explosives be a better alternative? I heard the alder is moving very slow, in some cases 30' in an hour.
I previously posted about using explosives to break ice, and i now have a new question:
If the [i]alder[/i] was not Purpose built for icebreaking, then why is it being used to break ice that some reports are saying is 5' thick? Would explosives be a better alternative? I heard the [i]alder[/i] is moving very slow, in some cases 30' in an hour.