Stewart J Cort

Discussion board focusing on Great Lakes Shipping Question & Answer. From beginner to expert all posts are welcome.
CottonwoodStudios
Posts: 80
Joined: March 13, 2011, 6:32 pm

Re: Stewart J Cort

Unread post by CottonwoodStudios »

I guess I never thought of it that way. When I was on, the engine crew used it a lot for whatever they needed done. It would make sense that they'd need something to open the hatches in case the pumps would fail.
Grizzly
Posts: 80
Joined: November 4, 2012, 9:31 am

Re: Stewart J Cort

Unread post by Grizzly »

Old I beamer wrote:Gee, things must of changed over the years. The USCG required us to have it to remove hatches when the automatic hatches didn't work. We sometime used it to remove thee ballast pumps.
See that is what I heard from the Cort's deck crew. That it was for opening the hatches in case of failure, as well as other uses. Also learned that it was operated and maintained by the engineering side and not deck crew.

Just what I heard when I was on.
Chris M
Posts: 704
Joined: July 28, 2009, 10:30 pm

Re: Stewart J Cort

Unread post by Chris M »

Old I beamer is correct. I was aboard her last yr and asked the same question and was told it was for the cargo hatches when the automatic system didnt work. It has also been used for other misc work but that's the main reason for having it onboard
Old I beamer

Re: Stewart J Cort

Unread post by Old I beamer »

Gee, things must of changed over the years. The USCG required us to have it to remove hatches when the automatic hatches didn't work. We sometime used it to remove thee ballast pumps.
Scott

Re: Stewart J Cort

Unread post by Scott »

Thanks, it kinda looked out of place.
ebs

Re: Stewart J Cort

Unread post by ebs »

to work on topside mounted ballast pump equipment.
Scott

Stewart J Cort

Unread post by Scott »

Why is there a crane on the deck of the Cort?
Post Reply